Brno Hat

Jiri Eischmann's Blog

Nextcloud Talk: video conferencing the open way

For instant messaging I’ve been primarily using Telegram. I think it’s a good compromise between openness and features and mass adoption. It can also do encrypted audio calls, but it can’t do video calls and audio/video conferences of multiple people.


That’s why I was looking for some tool for video calling and conferencing. I didn’t want something completely closed (Skype, Hangouts,…) and ideally something I can run on my server.

I’ve been a big fan of Nextcloud and running it on my Fedora VPS for 1,5 year. In my opinion it’s a great open platform for online services. They used to offer SpreedMe service which was pretty clumsy and difficult to install and I never fell for it. Fortunately they recently announced Nextcloud Talk, a complete rewrite, open source and based on WebRTC. Is it what I was looking for?

It requires Nextcloud 13, so I had to wait until this version was out this week. (I actually find it quite strange to announce and do a big PR for an app that requires a version of Nextcloud that hasn’t been released yet.) The installation is super-simple now. You just go to the application store, click “Enable”, and that’s it.

I’ve been using it for several days, so what is my experience with it? You can make calls with other users in your Nextcloud instance (it also supports federation, so you can extend it to users of other connected instances), but you can create a conference room to which you can invite other people via a link (can be protected by a password).

Besides basic audio and video calls it allows you to share a screen and there is a text chat available to participants which is handy e.g. for sharing links. It just works in modern browsers. You send someone a link, they open it, and you can start talking. Nextcloud Talk also have apps for Android and iOS, so you can join calls from your phone. But they can only do video and audio, they don’t support text chat yet and you can create a new call room in them.

Feature-wise Nextcloud Talk is already fairly close to Bluejeans, the enterprise solution we use for video conferencing in Red Hat.


Are there any problems? It’s the first release, there definitely are. One-to-one calls between registered users work reliably. I can’t say the same about conference calls with unregistered users. I tested it with two colleagues of mine who I invited via a link. I could only see video of one of them, he could see me, but couldn’t see the other person… Also connecting all participants is not always reliable.

Nextcloud offers its own STUN server. In settings you can add more STUN servers or even TURN server (but it’s not very desirable because all traffic then goes through your TURN server). I wonder if that would help.

There are also some problems in the UI. You can close the panel with the chat, but the icon for getting it back is black and it’s placed in the black corner of the video output of the other person, so it’s invisible. The UI of the mobile app sometimes sort of freezes, so it’s impossible to hang up.

But overall Nextcloud Talk looks very promising as a solution for those who want to easily deploy a video conferencing system on their premise. As I said one-to-one calls already work well for me and I hope the video conferences of multiple people will improve with future releases or I will find settings that fix the problems I’m having.

8 responses to “Nextcloud Talk: video conferencing the open way”

  1. Alexandre Franke Avatar

    I can’t help but wonder why they decided to do their own stuff and not integrate with Jitsi Meet.

    1. Jos Poortvliet Avatar

      We sure don’t do our own stuff! We use – I guess it was a better fit for our needs.

      1. Alexandre Franke Avatar

        When the alternative is reusing a complete client, the use of a lib like simpleWebRTC still feels like doing your own stuff. I have no doubt you did ponder the pros and cons, but having a public document showing that would provide insight to people that were not part of that research process.

        A common complaint about WebRTC calls is it doesn’t scale well especially for peers with a slow connection. Jitsi meet mitigates that with Videobridge. SimpleWebRTC doesn’t seem to offer a similar mechanism, so I’m really worried about the performances of a NextCloud Talk instance.

        1. Jos Poortvliet Avatar

          Pfff, this was discussed some 18 months ago, I don’t know if it was documented. Probably, in github, but it is hard to ignore the history. Note that there was an existing Spreed (written in Go) and Spreed developers.

          Taking the entire Jitsi probably would have made it harder to integrate deeply into Nextcloud, I can imagine, you’d want an application to fit in Nextcloud’s app infrastructure etcetera. But I don’t know the details and honestly I don’t see much value in litigating decisions made in 2016…

  2. […] Nextcloud Talk: video conferencing the open way […]

  3. westontechnologies Avatar

    I’ve been having a really hard time getting this to work and finding documentation about the Talk add on. I don’t have a Spreed, STUN, or TURN server setup. I suspect this along with having a strict firewall in place on the server is preventing this add on from working.

    Do you know of any good documentation about this? The Talk documentation is extremely limited (but has a lot of emojis….). Reading the spreed documentation, seems to mention certain ports and services (STUN/TURN) that needs to be accessible to make this add on work.

    I guess I’m interested in how you got this up and running. Was is simply just plug and play for you?

    1. nyslipt Avatar

      This. I feel I got mislead to think that the Nextcloud Talk app in version 13 would just work. It certainly isn’t so. I have currently tried v13.0.2, and the setup is pretty straight forward, and the Talk app seemingly works, but there is no sound or video going through, not even on my local LAN. I can see my own video in the browser, though.. Also, the phone app shows my own video, but not the other end. A bit more info on how to configure a STUN and/or TURN server on Fedora would certainly be appreciated! I followed this nice guide btw:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *